Ask Sawal

Discussion Forum
Notification Icon1
Write Answer Icon
Add Question Icon

Joonas McCafferty

Posted Questions

No Question(s) posted yet!

Posted Answers


Welcome to the final edition of our Tekken 7 Beginner’s Guide. Let’s discuss everything you need to know about the Rage System, including how to best use Arts and Drives. Learn when to use it to help overcome seemingly insurmountable life deficits.

The Rage System triggers once per round when a player’s health bar reaches a critical level. Rage is active when your character has a red aura and the health bar flashes red. Every attack deals more damage in Rage. Players often turn this disadvantage into strength:

In Tekken 6, characters entered Rage for the rest of the round at 5% health. The entire mechanic was reworked and expanded upon in Tekken 7. Rage now activates when a character reaches 20% health. The damage buff also correlates to the amount of health left. Less health means higher damage output.

Tekken 7 also introduced Rage Arts and Rage Drives, powerful attacks only available while Rage is active. Rage Arts are cinematic moves that function similar to Fatal Blows in Mortal Kombat 11 or Critical Edges in SoulCalibur VI. Rage Drives are enhanced versions of one or more of a character’s most iconic attacks. Once a Rage Drive or Rage Art is used, Rage deactivates for the remainder of the round.

Rage Arts are a controversial addition to Tekken 7. They are the first “super moves” in the series and have several properties that make them frustrating to handle. For example, Rage Arts armor through most attacks. Players will often take advantage of their opponent trying to close them out and Rage Art while under pressure. If their opponent presses a button at the wrong time, they can dish out a lot of damage and quickly turn the tide of the round.

At higher levels, spamming Rage Arts becomes less viable. Even though the armor is intimidating, they still pose a huge risk. Nearly all Rage Arts are -22 on block and can be launch-punished by just about any attack. Some characters like Alisa, Jin, and Steve have Rage Arts that are safe on block but can be easily ducked and punished. Others have unique Rage Arts that require different defensive counters. Lucky Chloe’s Rage Art is a low attack that must be blocked, while players must jump to avoid Akuma’s unblockable Rage Art.

Rage Arts deal somewhere between 50 and 70 damage alone depending on the remaining health. Their damage potential can reach up to half a life bar in combos. Some Rage Arts like Paul’s can be canceled on hit to start high-damage combos. Similarly, Yoshimitsu’s Rage Art can be canceled into his signature Soul Stealer parry. Though his Rage Art has no frame properties on block, whiffing the parry allows the opponent plenty of time to punish. Given the high risk they carry as well as the hefty, once-per-round reward, you should always make sure that your Rage Art connects if you are going to use it.

Rage Drives are much more plausible in neutral than Rage Arts. They are colloquially called “the Blue Stuff” in Tekken 7 because a character glows blue on use. The vast majority are plus on block and have useful properties that cater to their character. They can start, extend, or finish combos for devastating damage. Rage Drives tend to derive from one of the character’s most iconic attacks in their move lists. Some are nearly identical to their normal counterparts, such as JACK-7’s “blue” Debugger and Paul’s “blue” Death Fist.

Not all Rage Drives function as traditional attacks. For example:

Some characters can only unleash their Rage Drive from a specific stance. For instance, Ling Xiaoyu can only use it if her back is toward the opponent. Many characters like Hwoarang, Lars, and Steve have two Rage Drives that come from different stances. Lei Wulong, the premier stance character in Tekken, actually has five different Rage Drives. Rage Drives have more utility than Rage Arts, especially at high levels of play, but take more time to fully understand.

Knowing how and when to make the most of the Rage mechanic is crucial for mounting comebacks in Tekken 7. The best strategy is to stay in rage until you can finish the round with a Rage Art or Rage Drive, unless you’re in a desperate situation. You might even want to drop a combo before your opponent enters Rage. That way you can finish them more easily without their comeback factor.

Rage Arts excel as combo finishers. They also diminish the risk of dropped combos, helping you to close out rounds after screw attacks. A well-orchestrated combo into Rage Art can deal 90 or even 100 damage.

Use Rage Arts to counter aggressive opponents trying to close out rounds with pressure or oki. They will armor through any attack that won’t KO the user and make someone pay for overextending. If you are sure your opponent is going to press a button, go ahead and let it rip. Be careful of players feinting aggression in an attempt to bait a Rage Art. Experienced players will be more than prepared to punish it.

Unlike Rage Arts which are mostly universal, all Rage Drives are unique, so learn how to best use your main’s version. For example:

Many players throw Rage Drives out (plus on block) just to take away their opponent’s turn and set up their own offense. This is an especially effective strategy when pinning players near the wall for splat or bounce mixups. A handful of characters like Kazumi and Feng Wei deal chip damage when their Rage Drives are blocked against walls. While it is smart to save Rage Drives for the end of a round, their versatility allows for a variety of other strategies. Experiment with your favorite character until you figure out a few reliable options for different situations.

Answer is posted for the following question.

How to rage in tekken 7?


Every leader has had the experience of unveiling an organizational change — a new system or process, a corporate restructure, a shift in the business model — and getting a less-than positive response from their team. Sometimes the reaction is subtle: lowered eyes, tightened lips, silence. With a more confident or vocal team, you might get questions about whether the change is necessary, complaints about “yet another thing to do,” and lots of reasons why this just isn’t a good time for a big shift.

Why is change so hard for us?

Blame our history as a species. Until the past few generations, most people’s lives stayed very much the same from beginning to end: people grew up where their parents had grown up, did the work their parents had done, believed and knew the things previous generations had believed and known. Change, when it came, was generally an aberration and a danger.

But these days, the world is different. Major change happens moment to moment — economically, environmentally, sociologically, politically, and organizationally. Given all this, we need to re-wire ourselves to be more comfortable with and open to change; we need to become more change-capable.

I’ve been fascinated by change and our human response to it my whole adult life. In 1990, when I founded Proteus International, a coaching, consulting, and leadership development training firm, our mission was focused on change: we help clients clarify and move toward their hoped-for future. That remains our mission today, and in working with clients over the years to make changes large and small in their organizations, my colleagues at Proteus and I have observed what happens when an individual embraces a proposed change: there’s a simple, predictable, and powerful pattern. We’ve come to call this pattern “The Change Arc.”

When a change is first proposed, most people immediately want to know three things: what does this change mean to me, why is it happening, and what will it look like when the change has been made? We gather this information intuitively, in order to begin to assess the level of risk and difficulty involved in the change.

As people begin to ask these questions, their initial mindset (again, based on many thousands of years of change being seen as a threat) is usually that the change will be difficult, costly, and weird. Difficult means, “I don’t know how to do this, and/or other people are going to make it hard for me to do this.” Costly means, “this will take from me things I value.” This may be time or money, but is likely to involve more intrinsic and invisible valuables like identity, power, reputation, or relationships. And weird just means strange and unnatural: “this isn’t the way we do things around here.”

In observing this pattern, in our clients and in ourselves, we noticed that people only begin to be open to accepting, embracing, and making a change when their mindset starts to shift from “this change is going to be difficult, costly, and weird” to “this change could be easy, rewarding, and normal.” Once someone starts to believe that a change could be easy (or at least doable) to make; that the rewards of making the change will outweigh the costs; and that the change could become normal – that is, that it could be “the way we do things,” then that person starts to be willing to operate in the new ways the change requires – they’ll learn and do the new behaviors, and the change can occur.

Unfortunately, people often get “stuck” in their initial negative mindset about a change, and refuse (either quietly or overtly) to support it. And organizations and their leaders aren’t very skilled at helping their people make that mindset shift. There’s a well-known statistic from McKinsey & Co. that 70% of organizational change efforts fail, and that the primary reasons for that level of failure are lack of management support and employee buy-in. From our observation, that lack of support and buy-in are a consequence of people staying in the “difficult, costly, and weird” mindset about a change, and not being helped to see the change in a more neutral or even positive way.

So, how can you, as a leader, better support your people to make the mindset shift that will allow them to embrace change — to become more change-capable? By using “change levers.” Like physical levers, change levers are force multipliers that help accelerate people through their mindset shift around change. These are powerful tools for supporting your people through their change arc more quickly and easily, allowing changes to be adopted successfully. Here are four straightforward approaches you can take.

The first thing people want is foundational information about the change. Too often, organizations communicate a change in a cheery, superficial way (“We’re going to be converting to a new invoicing system — and it’s great!”) that doesn’t provide what people need — and, in fact, can simply increase their sense of risk. It’s most helpful to create and communicate a simple summary of the change that outlines:

For instance, instead of the superficial message above, this summary might sound like this:

It’s important that this summary be realistic — that it acknowledge the time and effort the change will require — and that it lets people know how you’ll support them (with information, training, etc.) to make the change. Once you’ve created this “case for change,” expect (and be prepared to answer) questions about it. Because we’re wired to believe that most change is dangerous, we generally only shift to a more neutral or positive view when we get the necessary information, stories, and experience to help us frame it differently.

Letting people know what isn’t changing as well as what is changing can be very reassuring. Quite often, even a major change won’t have much impact on people’s key priorities.

Let’s say that you’re reorganizing your salesforce into industry verticals, away from a geographic focus. By confirming that the roles and responsibilities of the account managers, inventory and planning people, and sales support staff will remain largely the same — and that the overall sales goals aren’t changing either — you can help people focus on what needs to change, instead of worrying about all the things that will be staying very much the same.

So rather than saying some version of, “Don’t worry, not everything is changing!” you might say something more specific to clarify the priorities: “Though we’ll be reorganizing the existing sales teams to work in category verticals, and your sales goals will be industry-specific, your core priorities are still to build and maintain great client relationships while meeting your financial targets.”

Especially with large-scale organizational change, employees can feel at the mercy of forces over which they have no say. By giving your people as many choices as possible during the change, you can reduce their fear and discomfort and increase the chances of engagement and buy-in.

A few years ago, we were working with a U.S.-based multinational company that had just acquired another company, headquartered in Latin America. The CHRO of the acquired company was worried about the change — she assumed the acquiring company would impose their systems, that she would have less influence, and that they might not understand or respect some of the HR policies necessary in their part of the world. She assumed the change would be difficult, costly, and weird.

Her new boss gave her control in a variety of ways. He worked with her to come up with the timing for the transition to the new systems, and he asked her to create a communication plan for how and when she wanted to announce the changes to her team. He also invited her to outline any LATAM-specific HR practices that she and her team would need to continue that weren’t part of the larger company’s HR processes. Giving her some elements of control in this way helped shift her mindset from negative to more supportive of the change; she began to focus on how to make the change easier and more rewarding for her team and for the rest of the acquired company’s employees.

Finally, but in some ways most importantly, your people need consistent support throughout any change that affects them directly. Too often, leaders try to talk people out of what they’re feeling or even just ignore it — assuming they’ll eventually “get with the program.”

It’s critical to remember that, as a leader, by the time you communicate a change to your people, you’ve generally had some time to go through your own change arc. But we often expect our employees to be as accepting of the change from that first moment as we are after our own months of thought, questioning, and mindset shift.

Answer is posted for the following question.

Why change is hard?


in your TECNO Pouvoir 3 Air device, The FRP feature will automatically Enable as soon as you add a Google Account to your TECNO Pouvoir 3 Air

Answer is posted for the following question.

How to bypass google account on tecno lb7?


  • Without further ado, here are the steps to turn your Android smartphone's lens to a DSLR-quality camera:
  • Step #1 - Check the version of your Android phone.
  • Step #2 - Download Google Camera for your Android's current version.
  • Step #3 - Choose your snapshot option.

Answer is posted for the following question.

How to make dslr camera at home?


Usage: Intel(R) Technology Access exposes the 2-in-1 sensor and display setting detection to the browser applications using web services The 2-in-1 sensor determines the mode of a device (for example: tablet mode or clamshell mode) The Display settings detect and get the screen resolution and orientation values

Answer is posted for the following question.

What is intel(r) technology access?


Steve Harvey's net worth is $200 million He oversees a media empire that includes radio, television, clothing, books and more In a typical year he earns $45

Answer is posted for the following question.

What is steve harvey's net worth?


Larry Dee Wilcox is an American actor best known for his role as Jonathan "Jon" Baker in the television series "CHiPs", which ran from 1977 to 1983 on NBC. Wilcox is a Vietnam veteran and is a private pilot.

Wilcox was the son of John C. Wilcox and his wife, and was raised by their single mother. He attended the University of Wyoming and then Los Angeles Pierce College.

He attended Cal State Northridge. I've worked as an actor, rodeo cowboy and as a waitress.

Wilcox enlisted in the Marine Corps in 1967, and served in Vietnam during the Vietnam War. He was discharged with the rank of Staff Sergeant in 1973.

Wilcox was a guest in Room 222 in 1971.

Wilcox played George in The Streets of San Francisco episode "The Runaways". He starred in Lassie as Dale, a boy who was working as a hired hand, and grew up there. Wilcox appeared in an episode of Cannon "Target In The Mirror" in 1973, as a witness. He was in the 1976 film The Last Hard Men, as well as commercials and TV appearances. He was the main actor of a two-part show on The Wonderful World of Disney anthology show in 1978 playing a lone cowboy on a cattle drive and his adventures of him en route to market.

The Last Ride of the Dalton Gang was the second film he played.

Wilcox was cast as Jon Baker, one of the lead characters on CHiPs, but was not in season six. Wilcox did many of his own stunts. Wilcox did not sustain any major injuries, unlike his co-star. He made the same amount of money per episode for the 1979–80 season as he did for the previous season.

Wilcox appeared on the cover of TV Guide three times during his time on the show.

After Wilcox came to his friend's aid after he was injured, rumors of a feud between the two had stopped. Wilcox said that some of the rumors of on-set feuding were true.

He said that they were two totally different people.

Wilcox was one of the cast members who attended the 35th anniversary of the show.

Wilcox filmed the event and helped raise money for police officers. Wilcox stated that he invited him, as did Robert Pine, but that he did not show up. The manager said he was trying to establish a new identity.

Wilcox left CHiPs in 1982 and formed his own production company, Wilcox Production, which produced the award-winning TV series for five years. He optioned and sold to MGM The Yorkshire Ripper.

Wilcox was the executive producer of Flipper for Universal Pictures. He continued to act and direct.

Wilcox works with a production company called Saratoga Entertainment. He is a consultant to Enabledware, which is a rule-based digital distribution software with a focus on digital universities and security for stadiums.

Wilcox was an executive producer of the movie Death of a Centerfold: The Dorothy Stratten Story. Wilcox's older sister was killed in front of her three children, her mother, and 17 witnesses. Wilcox said that the accused murderer's husband was acquitted in a Wyoming trial and later killed in a barroom brawl.

The Dirty Dozen: Next Mission was a made-for-TV movie that he appeared in. He was recruited to help kill a German general who was planning to assassinate Hitler.

Wilcox and his co-star in National Lampoon's Loaded Weapon 1 were reacquainted in 1998 when Wilcox reprised his role of Jon Baker in the Turner Network Television production of CHiPs '99. Wilcox played a San Diego Police sergeant in the 2008 music video for "Bartender Song (Sittin' at a Bar)" by Rehab. 10

He appeared in a scene as himself on the Christmas episode of 30 Rock.

Wilcox played a role in the film Two Sillies. He played the owner of mine in 94 Feet. Least we not forget his role on "THE LOVE BOAT" as Sergeant Belouski in his protection of a star witness on Season 4, Episode 1. web|last=Tribune-Star|first=Mark Bennett|title=MARK BENNETT: Tragedy awakens small Indiana coal-mining town in '94 Feet'|url= /article_900b27b2-9334-58e2-ace2-0ae57cf2c507.html%7Caccess-date=2021-01-14%7Cwebsite=Terre Haute Tribune-Star|language=en}}

Wilcox married his first wife, Judy Vagner, on March 29, 1969 while he was still in Vietnam.

They had two children. His first marriage was to a Dutch woman named Hannie Strasser. The wedding took place on April 11, 1980. Their daughter, Wendy, was born in 1982 and they divorced after her birth.

Wilcox married a member of the 1980 Olympics heptathlon team. They have two children.

Answer is posted for the following question.

Why did larry wilcox leave chips?


At the turn of the 20th century, Brown changed the college's name to Valparaiso College, and soon after it was rechartered as Valparaiso University. Initially founded by Methodists, the Lutheran University Association purchased it in 1925. The Association continues to operate it today.

Answer is posted for the following question.

Who owns valparaiso university?