Why dragon didn t kill jon snow?
Oh man, that finale scene still haunts me! After Jon stabs Daenerys, Drogon swoops in, and I'm like, "Roast him, you magnificent beast!" But nope, he just nuzzles her and melts the Iron Throne instead. Here's my take: Dragons are smarter than we think. Drogon sensed Jon's Targaryen blood—remember, Jon rode Rhaegal like a pro? That family bond probably kicked in, making it impossible for Drogon to torch his own kin. Plus, symbolically, the throne was the real villain, corrupting Dany and leading to her downfall. Drogon knew what had to be done. It's poetic, right? If you're rewatching, pay attention to those subtle dragon glances—they're plotting world domination, I swear. Epic stuff from GRRM!
A Deeper Dive into Westerosi Dragon Lore Look, as a die-hard book fan who's read Fire & Blood twice, the show's explanation feels rushed, but let's break it down logically: - Targaryen Connection: Jon's heritage isn't just trivia; dragons bond with their riders on a magical level. Drogon, grieving his "mother," might've recognized Jon as family, halting any attack instinct. - Symbolic Rage: Melting the throne? That's Drogon saying, "This chair of swords killed her ambitions." It corrupted Aegon the Conqueror and now Dany—power's the true enemy. - Practical Plot Armor: Haha, yeah, the writers probably spared Jon for the exile arc. But in the books, if it happens, expect more nuance. For more theories, check out this ScreenRant article—solid analysis without spoilers. What do you think, book or show canon?
Unpopular Opinion: Drogon spared Jon 'cause he's the true heir. Subtle nod to Azor Ahai prophecy? Nah, but it fits. Throne melt = end of old ways. Brilliant closure.
As a casual viewer, I was baffled too. But chatting with friends, we agreed: Drogon pitied Jon. The poor guy's aunt-lover was turning tyrant; mercy kill, dragon-style. No hate, just tragic family drama. Adds depth to the ending—Westeros needed that reset.
From a psychological angle, Drogon exhibited classic grief response—denial and displacement. Instead of lashing out at Jon (the catalyst), he targeted the throne, symbolizing the systemic issues that drove Dany mad. Fascinating how Dahl—no, wait, GRRM—layers animal intelligence into fantasy. Jon's survival underscores themes of reluctant heroism; he's burdened, not burned. If dragons could talk, Drogon might've said, "You did what she wouldn't—end the cycle." Mind-blowing, isn't it?
In the grand tapestry of A Song of Ice and Fire, Drogon's restraint reveals the Valyrian steel of draconic loyalty. Jon, forged in the fires of Rhaegar's line, was untouchable—not by flame, but by fate. The beast understood: the throne's jagged edges, not the dagger's point, severed the Mother of Dragons. A poignant elegy to ambition's cost. For scholarly takes, IGN's breakdown nails it.
Short answer: Because plot. Drogon was too busy being a dramatic icon, flying off with Dany's body like a loyal steed. No time for BBQ Snow.
Um, guys? Drogon did wanna kill Jon but got distracted by shiny metal. Priorities, amirite? Classic dragon hoarding vibes.
Fellow Thrones Obsessive Here That moment? Peak television. Drogon didn't kill Jon because: 1. Blood Ties: Half-Targ, half-Stark—dragons don't eat family. 2. Empathy Over Instinct: He mourned, then destroyed the source of Dany's tyranny. 3. Narrative Mercy: GRRM loves subverting expectations. Rewatch S8E6; the dragon's eyes say it all. Who's your fave dragon, anyway? Drogon all the way!